I have a complicated relationship with cryptocurrency

I have a complicated relationship with cryptocurrency.

I really want to like it, but perhaps that's just the cyberlibertarian - the optimist, the tech utopianist - in me talking.

I don't like the control that payment service providers have, or their ability to break a business by withdrawing services. Yet they are private companies, and so - IMHO - it is up to them to whom they wish to offer their services.

I would like a payment system which anyone can use, including to run their business, without fear of having the rug being pulled from under their feet and their account closed. A system without centralised control. A system without the fear of a freezing order.

I don't like the way a bank or card provider can surveil one's purchases, or engage in data mining. I am a person, not a data point, and an intermediary such as a payment provider should have no business in taking a peek at what I buy, or from whom.

I would like a payment system which precluded this kind of surveillance, so that any intermediary - if there must be one - has not just no business in inspecting my transactions, but no ability to do so.

Yes, I appreciate that an anonymous, unblockable, means of payment could be - is likely to be - abused. Does that mean it is a bad idea?

After all, so many things can be abused. Computers. Cars. Clothes. Water. Do we have an obligation - legal? moral? ethical? - to attempt to design things to minimise the risk of abuse, even if that means compromising on useful features?

I like the peer-to-peer nature of cash. A system which facilitated direct, peer-to-peer payments would be ideal, IMHO. Is that compatible with a cryptocurrency?

As far as I know, cryptocurrencies today involve some kind of register, on which transactions are recorded. I could avoid that, by giving someone my wallet but, without checking that central record, would the recipient know whether what was in that wallet had any value?

I like the fact that I can pay face-to-face in cash without needing an Internet connection. (Well, in principle. In practice, I don't do much shopping face-to-face.) Perhaps - register look-up aside - that could be handled by a wireless protocol within a hardware wallet.

I don't like the inability to pay remotely with cash. I'd like a cryptocurrency where I could pay both locally / in-person, and remotely, with the same ease.

Like cash, I am willing to take the risk associated with theft, or a scam. If I hand over cash to a scammer, I don't expect to get it back. If I mis-manage my key, just as if I mis-manage my coins, I don't expect someone to step in and recompense me.

But this means I'm likely to use cryptocurrency only in relatively small amounts, a bit like drawing cash from a bank account. I might be willing to take the risk in small amounts, but not much more than that. So I think I like the idea of cryptocurrency alongside more traditional banking. But then I'm lucky to have ready access to banking.

I don't like the environmental implications of Bitcoin. The colossal energy usage. It's unsustainable.

I don't like the feeling I have that cryptocurrencies are a Ponzi scheme: that they only work if people keep joining, and committing their money. Perhaps I just don't understand them well enough.

I don't like the uncertainty I have around value. I have spent around £100 on Bitcoin. Of that, I have spent around £20. So why do I have £450 of Bitcoin? That growth is massive - over 450%.

If it can go up like that, why should it not also go down? As a currency, I want the value to remain reasonably constant.

I want to know what the things in my wallet can buy me, with a reasonably degree of certainty.

And if I want to get paid in cryptocurrency, I need to know if I should charge 50, 500, or 5000, of whatever it is.

And I don't want to find that I've asked for 50 when I started the work, but need to ask for 5000 at the end of the work, to get the same relative payment. I could link it to a fiat currency - that I want £x worth of cryptocurrency - but something in me doesn't like that idea.

I also need to be able to buy enough things in cryptocurrency to justify taking them for payment. I don't want to be trapped in a world of conversion charges.

I like the fact that I can buy anything in the UK using pounds sterling. I don't like the idea that I might only have cryptocurrency A, but the person with whom I am transacting only has cryptocurrency B. While diversification may be good for some things, it is a pain when it comes to exchanges. That is, in essence, why we have money: so that I don't have to find someone who is willing to sell me the wheat I want in exchange for the ox I am willing to offer in return, for example. If I am forced through a conversion system, that's sub-optimal.

So even if there is a cryptocurrency which solves my problems, unless it also solves everyone else's problems such that it is commonly adopted - or, at least, that enough people with whom I want to transact adopt it - it's sub-optimal. We're back to the network effect which plagued early communications networks.

So, yes. Complicated.


Author: neil

I'm Neil. By day, I run a law firm, decoded.legal, giving advice on Internet, telecoms, and tech law. This is my personal blog, so will be mostly about tech stuff, cycling, and other hobbies.

You can find me (and follow me) on Mastodon and Twitter.